While it is true, the famous social network Facebook is used by billions of users worldwide, especially through their mobile. But, unfortunately, many of them get performance failures and errors because of this application , especially people who handle Android devices.
That is why, Mark Zuckerberg and his team decided to create and develop an application called “ Facebook Lite ”, which is intended for emerging markets. In addition, it has also been implemented to provide a solution for slow connections . Thus, an app that occupies less than 2 MB and can offer several of the functions that the “normal” or standard Facebook application ensures.
But, given this dilemma between the two applications, users of the social network wonder about which one is more optimal to use and well, in what aspects are different from each other in order to download and install the most indicated on your Smartphone or Tablet. Indeed, we want to let you know the main differences between Facebook “normal” application and Facebook Lite , below.
Index:
Comparison: Main differences between Facebook Lite and Facebook « which one should i use on my mobile
In order to know which Facebook application to choose to use on your mobile and that works perfectly, in this section we present a substantial comparison, with which you will achieve better differentiate Facebook Lite from Facebook “ normal “. Since, although you do not believe it, both present extremely relevant dissimilarities. Thus, know the following:
Performance
In reference to this aspect, a completely remarkable dissimilarity can be found between both Facebook mobile applications. Since, once you start using Facebook “ normal ” and Facebook Lite for a while, you will be able to notice the great difference in performance that each of them throws .
In this sense, it should be noted that the Facebook Lite app has an abominable fluency . Especially, when you go doing “ scroll ” or slide over the timeline of your account from this app. Which, it is totally logical for the little space it occupies on the device and for this, it was already expected.
In addition to this, it can be seen that it also has little capacity to load messages on the timeline . That is, Lite can load very few messages and because of this, when you want to see new messages, you will have to load them every two times three .
In this aspect of performance, it should also be noted that, in terms of load times , Lite is completely disadvantageous when compared to the normal app. Since, it is visualized that the loading times in the transitions of the app are enormous , regardless of whether it is to open a small image, to visit the profile of a friend or to enter a new page in the timeline.
In summary, if you want to use an application that yields good performance in general, it is best that you install the “normal” FB application and put aside the idea of using Facebook Lite . Since, the dissimilarities in performance are very noticeable.
The interface
After performance, the particularity that shows the greatest difference between normal Facebook and Lite, is the change in the interface . Which, in the Lite version is completely reduced and is much more minimalist .
In detail, we indicate that, at the top of the screen, the sections that show both apps are totally different . Since, in reference to the normal application, it only shows the search bar in the blue bar. Now, in the case of FB Lite, it contains icons inserted in the blue bar and the search bar disappears, so now is transformed into another section with a magnifying glass icon .
Also, located on the home page of the social network, you will also see that one app changes from the other. Starting because the complete app shows the images that your friends share on the network, with a very visible and comfortable size . But, this changes in the Lite version which, reduces them in order to take less time to load. So, if you want to see it in a larger size, you have to click on the content.
On the other hand, there are also differences in the icons to give “ Like ” and “ Comment ” a publication. Given that, the version of Facebook Lite contains much more minimalist icons and suppresses the text signage of the “likes” that a certain publication obtained, as does the number of comments.
In short, the rest of the FB Lite tabs look smaller, with less colorful and more modest icons . Which was designed in such a way because they assumed that the application would be used on small screens and so they adapted it that way.
So, if you like to have a more detailed, comfortable and attractive experience on Facebook, it is recommended that you use the “normal” application . Since, the Lite app gives the feeling of being a more “dirty” and old platform.
Weight and download of the application
Before downloading and installing any mobile app, what users mostly verify is the weight of the application . Since, this influences during the download process and also in the performance of the mobile, in case of presenting or not the indicated capacity.
Well, in the case of the complete Facebook mobile application , it has a total weight of 60 MB . Which is not an inconvenience or restriction for people who proceed to download it with WiFi or 4G , but if you have a slow connection, the most indicated is that do not install this application .
Now, as for the application of Facebook Lite , of course it has a lower weight and this is between 2 MB in total. So, even and when you have a clearly slow Internet connection, this will not matter because in a matter of seconds you will be able to access your social network account through that app.
However, with respect to the use of the internal memory of the mobile, the normal Facebook application throws a weight of 128 MB (without temporary or user data) and this increases when you register and you run the platform, since it can increase up to 307 MB . Which does not happen with Lite because only occupies 4.56 MB in memory and when you register and do what you want within the app, the size only grows to 6 MB >.
With this, you can understand that Lite is more advantageous for users who do not want to take up much space in their terminal just by using Facebook . Bearing in mind that, the difference in the weight of the normal version and the Lite version is quite abysmal.
The functions
Facebook Lite, being a simpler and simplified application, of course adds fewer features than the full FB application . Therefore, in this aspect, we also find a very relevant dissimilarity. In this way, we highlight the functions that the Lite version does guarantee to be more specific, which are:
- Comments and “likes” or “likes” usual.
- Timeline of states.
- Requests and suggestions tab of friends.
- Search section.
- Notifications tab.
- Facebook Messenger integrated. Which contains text, stickers and the possibility of sending or sharing photographs.
- Profile page and managed pages.
- Automatic playback of videos on WiFi network.
In this sense, the FB Lite integrates the most used functions in the social network and when adding Facebook Messenger, it presents good points to factor. Therefore, is not that it is a poor application of functions or mechanisms of interest within Facebook.
But, if you choose to enjoy a more complete experience within the social network, it is best that you use the “normal” application of FB because it wins completely in terms of functions . Including the new “ likes ”, the famous Facebook stories, the possibility of broadcasting live videos and many others.
Battery consumption
As well as the difference in weight between the normal Facebook application and the Lite version, there is also a dissimilarity between both apps regarding the battery consumption generated in a mobile or Tablet . Except that, this is evidenced on a smaller scale.
Well, in terms of battery consumption observed when using the application through FB Lite, it is minimal because only decreases 1 by the way on an average time scale. On the contrary, the normal Facebook app can consume up to 3 percent of the total applications used .
If you evaluate this in the first instance, it may not be so considerable. However, when you verify it in the long term, the difference can be much more noticeable and substantial .
Is it really worth using Facebook Lite if I have a smartphone from mid-range?
To classify a mobile as “ mid-range ”, the aspects to be taken into account are related to its processor, power, price, additives, material quality and other aspects. Which, in certain circumstances, may be limiting. Especially, those that rely on the power and processor of the equipment .
Well, before this, the question arises about the pre-existing need of users with mid-range Smartphone, to use Lite versions of certain applications and the benefits that this can bring to your mobile.
In the case of the Facebook application, basically depends on the user’s requirements . Since, although it is true, when using FB Lite you can handle Facebook Messenger in a small space, little memory used and little data spent.
Which is an excellent benefit for who have a modest phone that does not exhibit great power . So, if your mid-range phone cannot be classified as a powerful device, it is best to use Facebook Lite.
Now, if said mid-range Smartphone from now on can be located between mobiles with a remarkable power and, in addition, it does not present problems of bad connection or performance, there is not much advantage around to make use of the Lite version of Facebook. Since then, you could download and install the normal application , because it will work perfectly on your device and, in addition, you will get more advanced features such as Facebook Live, publish stories on the social network, etc.